Pular para o conteúdo

The significant standard beta coefficient (? = –0

The significant standard beta coefficient (? = –0

The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale talkwithstranger, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.

The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.

The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.

That it offered the fresh theory the rationalist epistemology appears to the good decreased amount of engagement with the Engagement subscale and also the constructivist epistemology appears into the an increased level of wedding on the Engagement subscale

Ergo, epistemology (rationalist compared to. constructivist) is found to be a critical predictor out of treatment concept. Specifically, more strong conclusions render provisional assistance on sense one to there are certain variations in the non-public particular the newest counselor according to the therapists’ epistemic assumptions. A great deal more especially, the modern analysis unearthed that therapists having rationalist epistemologies tended into a whole lot more distance, a lower amount of involvement, an effective narrower attention, and you can a greater amount of believe within their instructions having clients, while, the newest constructivist epistemology tended toward that have a greater degree of intimacy, an elevated amount of involvement, a wide attention, and more love of life inside their cures courses. On the other hand, there is certainly specific assistance on insight that therapists having constructivist epistemologies are most likely on brand new guidelines out-of freedom unlike rigidity into the their treatment concept; but not this was not an especially strong wanting in the current study.

Such findings are helpful with regards to this new potentially built-in variations managed by rationalist as opposed to constructivist epistemologies predicated on cures design. So much more particularly, newest results contain the opinion one intellectual-behavioral therapies, and therefore represent the best portrayal of your rationalist epistemology, look after a keen “active-directive” and you can systematic method to procedures (Granvold, 1988) which have particular requires accustomed plan the class of your training (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).

Hypothesis 2-Epistemology Impacts the new Healing Dating

According to the next hypothesis-therapists with rationalist epistemologies commonly score high with the Task and you will Goal subscales and lower on the Thread subscale compared to the constructivist epistemologies-another multiple linear regression model is actually presented to decide if your same predictor varying (counselor epistemology) manage dictate therapists’ studies of traditional parameters (doing work alliance) based on therapists’ scores of about three subscales-Task, Goal, and you can Bond.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado.